No subject
Tue May 3 10:41:24 EDT 2011
"faith" and "faithfulness". The two concepts are grouped together in one
semantic unit, and it is only because English does not group these two concepts
together in one word than we tend to think about them as distinct semantic units
rather than different aspects of the same unit.
We would need to look at ALL the occurrences of PISTIS + genitive before we can
make any conclusion. It would certainly be helpful to know what was done in
Hellenistic Greek outside the NT. Maybe someone can tell us?
We need to remember that the genitive relationship in linguistic terms only
means that two nouns are associated together. The semantic relationship existing
between the nouns is not shown by the genitive. It is determined by a common
established usage - if there is one. If normal usage allows for more than one
possibility, we need to look to the context for clarification. (For instance,
"God's love" in English refers to God being the agent for the divalent verb
"love", but "love of God" is ambiguous. It could describe love as having its
source in God or God being either the agent (subject) or patient (object) for
love.)
I would disagree with the hypothesis that whenever PISTIS + genitive noun
occurs, PISTIS means "faithfulness". Such a hypothesis is not supported by the
various contexts. I also disagree with Hayes' claim that the construction is
objective in Galatians. It is ruled out by the contexts of Gal 2:16 and 3:22, as
well as Relevance Theory. (All the English bible translations of Gal 2:16 that I
have checked translate DIA PISTEWS IHSOU CRISTOU as "through faith in Jesus
Christ" and EK PISTEWS CRISTOU as "by/on the basis of faith in Christ".)
Relevance Theory basically says that the interpretation that is most relevant
and fitting in the context is most likely to be the one the author had in mind.
The context of Galatians does not talk about the faithfulness of Christ, but
about being accepted by God through observance of Jewish customs or through
faith in Christ alone.
As a little aside one can look at 2 Peter 1:1 which says
TOIS ISOTIMON hUMIN LACOUSIN PISTIN EN DIKAIOSUNH TOU QEOU hHMWN KAI SWTHROS
IHSOU CRISTOU
To those who have received the same precious faith as we have by means of the
righteousness of Jesus Christ, our God and Saviour.
This does not mean "faith in the righteousness of God" even though PISTIN is
followed by EN.
Context, context, context.
Iver Larsen
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list