From: Larry W. Hurtado (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Sep 25 1995 - 17:49:06 EDT
On Mon, 25 Sep 1995, Kenneth Litwak wrote:
> Can someone tell me the difference in meaning or significance of the
> use of the periphrastic participle, such as the periphrastic pluperfect
> in Mark 6:52, compares to a simpler form, like just a pluperfect passive
> verb? Also, in this episode of walking on the water, Jesus announces
> to the disciples "egw eimi". I don't really expect at this point Jesus
> meant to be telling his discplies he was Yahweh, and even if he had,
> from their reaction, they clearly would not have accepteD THAT.
> I'm wondering therefore if there are other examples outside the NT of
> the use of ego eimi without any modifiers, and what it probably means
> in those passages. Thanks.
Ken, In approaching Mark 6:52, we have to recognize that what we have is
a _Markan episode_, not a photographic account of something Jesus did or
said. In understanding the sense of the account, therefore, the first
question is "What is it likely that *Mark* is doing with the account?"
and not "What is it likely that *Jesus* means here?" Thus, the lst
question with regard to the "ego eimi" here is "What is it likely that
*Mark* intends in putting this statement on Jesus' lips?" To offer an
answer, in light of the rather numinous qualities Mark gives to Jesus
here and elsewhere, I suggest that the "ego eimi" is intended on two
levels--both as a straightforward self-identification ("It's me!"), but
also as an echo/hint of OT divine self-identification language which =
Jesus here is speaking like Yhwh, reflecting Jesus' divine-like status
and powers. This, I suggest, is Mark's probable intentions in the
passage. It's altogether another question as to what things Jesus may or
may not have actually said and intended.
Larry Hurtado, Religion, Univ. of Manitoba
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:28 EDT