From: Stephen Carlson (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Oct 09 1995 - 09:08:19 EDT
> So in conclusion, the Bible really gives no support for any "unknown
> prayer language." In fact, every evidence points to the fact that these
> tongues were a known language that could and should be interpreted (cf. 1
> Cor. 14:28).
That the technical terms GLWSSAI, GENH GLWSSWN, and EN GLWSSHi (-AIS)
LALEIN (always anarthrous) refers to xenolalia, as suggested supra, is
a minority position.
I think it is fairly clear that those terms referred to ecstatic utterances
["GLWSSA," BADG (2d ed. 1979) "There is no doubt about the thing referred
to, namely the broken speech of persons in religious ecstasy."]. This is
not surprising, given the cultural context of the Corthinian church. [See
generally, Ralph Bruce Terry, A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF FIRST CORINTHIANS 32-
33 (1995) (explaining why the Corinthians would be so eager about tongues
and including an example of Attic GLOTTAI).]
Textually, this seems to be the case. GLWSSAI are sometimes described as
"of angels" (TWN AGGELWN 1Co12:10). A charism (hERMHNEIA GLWSSWN 13:1) is
needed to interpret them (14:13). As a "prayer language," that may be
inferred from 14:28 (hEATWi DE LALEITW KAI TWi QEWi).
For a good scholarly treatment and bibliography, I recommend C.M. Robeck,
Jr., "Tongues," A DICTIONARY OF PAUL & HIS LETTERS (1993).
-- Stephen Carlson : Poetry speaks of aspirations, : ICL, Inc. firstname.lastname@example.org : and songs chant the words. : 11490 Commerce Park Dr. (703) 648-3330 : Shujing 2:35 : Reston, VA 22091 USA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:29 EDT