Re: here's what's wrong with Q

From: Nichael Cramer (
Date: Tue Oct 24 1995 - 00:29:59 EDT

On Tue, 24 Oct 1995 wrote:
> dear Nichael.
> Thanks for your explanation of a scientific hypothesis. With regard to
> the existence of Q, however, there is also an historical aspect, viz.,
> whether there existed at some time before the writing of both Matthew and
> Luke a source which they used.

And --one final time-- how do we establish the existence of such an object
other than by examining the available data?


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:30 EDT