From: Bart Ehrman (behrman@email.unc.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 06 1995 - 06:18:35 EST
The postings on Markan style have been quite stimulating. I have
two, genuine, questions.
(1) Rodney Decker wrote:
> The Greek of the NT has been described as conversational Greek
>(in contrast to literary and vernacular Greek).
THis is a judgment with which others have concurred. My question:
How do we know, really, what conversational Greek was like?
(2) Edgar M. Krentz wrote:
> In comparison to the non-literary papyri Mark stands out as one who [at
> least in the text we have] spells correctly [little evidence of
> itacism].
Again, is there any way to know, really, whether Mark could spell?
Thanks, again, to both contributors. These postings have been quite
useful.
-- Bart D. Ehrman, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:33 EDT