From: Edward Hobbs (EHOBBS@wellesley.edu)
Date: Wed Jan 17 1996 - 17:50:59 EST
I don't understand either of Carleton's posts on this.
(1) Loeb says SE (p. 326) in both printings I have (1946 and 1950).
Does Carleton have an altered text of some sort? Or was a misprint
introduced?
(2) Kirsopp Lake translates: "You I should have held worthy of
discussion" = "I should have held you worthy of discuission." Either way,
in English the "you" is a direct object of the verb, just as the SE is in
the Greek. Are we somehow dealing with different texts?
The Greek looks very simple and straightforward to me. I'm puzzled
over the confusion.
Edward Hobbs
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:36 EDT