From: Carlton L. Winbery (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Mar 08 1996 - 04:36:10 EST
Dale Wheeler wrote;
>Greetings parse-ologists. Here's an interesting conflict in the tools ! In
>Luke 16:2 the phrase TI TOUTO is parsed by some as accusative (evidently
>Direct Object of AKOUW, either together as a compound interrogative or TOUTO
>is the D.O. and TI is predicate to TOUTO with the copula elided). Others
>parse them as nominative (evidently an equative clause with the copula
>elided, and the relative pronoun which refers back to TOUTO and functions as
>the D.O. of AKOUW also elided).
>For those of you who are into crytology, BDF #299(1) refers to this
>construction and says that TI is being used predicatively with TAUTA/TOUTO,
>then give examples which could go either way with no real explanation: Acts
>14:15 vs Matt 26:62.
There seems to me to be only two possibilities. TI TOUTO is "What is
this?" You would expect it to be followed by hOTI or a relative pronoun.
It would then be ellyptical for "What is this (that) I hear about you." TI
could also be translated "why?" "Why am I hearing this about you?" TOUTO
is then object of the verb and TI is an interrogative particle.
Carlton L. Winbery
LA College, Pineville, La
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:39 EDT