RE: GYNAIKAS in accusative

Date: Wed May 01 1996 - 09:19:34 EDT

Is there validity in the argument that GYNAIKAS in v. 11 should be viewed
as the category "women" deacons rather than "wives" of deacons since the
three accusatives (vv. 2, 8, 11) are in an object relationship to DEI in
v. 2??

Although it seems awkward in interupt male deacons and return to them
in v. 12, v. 12 at lease starts a new structure when it readdresses
male deacons.

Gary T. Meadors
Grand Rapids Bap Sem

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:41 EDT