Date: Thu Aug 08 1996 - 14:42:56 EDT
email@example.com writes on 8/8/96:
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > It's an interlingual pun for a bilingual audience, "Before Abraham
> > was born, YHWH."
> In all my other excercises I am able to substitute nouns for nouns,
> adjectives for adjectives and verbs for verbs, etc. This is one
> of the ways I check my translations.
This mechanical procedure will not hold up in all situations. For example,
translating "It's raining cats and dogs" into other languages word for
word doesn't work: it's usually nonsense in the target language. But,
the main difficulty is that languages express many things at different
semantic levels. Even translations which have a good correspondence
with the original and make "sense" in the source and target languages
do not reproduce the original. This is one reason why many people see
translation as either a doomed, flawed, or creative enterprise.
> But I have a real problem with John 8:58 :
> Joh 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you,
> Before Abraham was, 'Fred'.
> If 'I AM' is a proper name, should not this make sense.
Does Ex 3:14 make such sense ? "I AM has sent me to you." Only in a
double sense, as when Cyclops bewails "NO MAN has put out my eye."
The "pun" does not depend on EGW EIMI being a proper name, but on
*both* the fact that it means "I am" in Greek and the fact that YHWH
was translated "I am" in Greek.
> It seems to me that what does not make good English also does not
> make good Greek.
A more popular rule of thumb is "What does not make good theology
also does not make good Greek." (Who says we're reading "good Greek"?)
A more telling one might be "What does not make good Greek also does
not make good Hebrew."
Will Wagers "Reality is the best metaphor."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:48 EDT