From: Jonathan Robie (74144.2360@CompuServe.COM)
Date: Tue Aug 20 1996 - 12:49:09 EDT
Carl W. Conrad wrote:
> The fact that EIMI has only the present (durative, continuous)
> aspect is precisely the reason why Parmenides was able to
> use forms of the verb EIMI to "prove" that time and motion
> are illusory.
I would be interested in this proof, and precisely how he uses
the word EIMI in the proof.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:49 EDT