From: Stephen C. Carlson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Aug 30 1996 - 01:14:59 EDT
At 08:31 8/27/96 +1200, David and Glennis Cashmore wrote:
>Sounds like a great idea to me.
>Would it cover "all" methods (excluding textual I assume)?
>e.g. source, form, tradition, redaction, literary, structural, canonical
Yes, it would cover all methods as you have described. Although I
would prefer see such a list be run out of a university, I would be
willing to create such a list from my own resources -- if there is a
sufficient demand for a scholarly list about higher (non-textual)
criticism. Is this a viable possibility? Would people join?
-- Stephen C. Carlson : Poetry speaks of aspirations, email@example.com : and songs chant the words. http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/ : -- Shujing 2.35
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:50 EDT