From: James H. Vellenga (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Sep 16 1996 - 09:17:47 EDT
> John Oaklands wrote;
> >Does hINA in John 9:3 indicate purpose or result (or something else)? What
> >are the implications either way?
Carlton L. Winbery replied:
> hINA . . . GENNHQHi in vs 2 seems to be result. "Who sinned, this one or
> his parents, with the result that he was born blind?" Sin resulted in
> suffering in their view.
> Verse four emphasizes taking the opportunity to work the works of God while
> it is time. "We must work the works of the one who sent me . . ."
> I would think that vs 3 then would not teach that God caused this to happen
> so that Jesus could come along and heal, but that the man's blindness
> results into an apportunity to do God's work.
> Perhaps I see it that way because that's the way I want it to be.
Question: [A: parents or man sinned] hINA [B: man born blind]?
Answer: not [A: parents or man sinned]
[B: man born blind (implied)] hINA [C: works of God
could get disclosed in his life]
Not only does Jesus (as quoted) deny the premise, but Jesus also
reverses the sense of the hINA. I.e., the disciples are asking
what is the condition A such that B, but Jesus reverses the thinking
by stating B such that C.
I'm wondering what that means. If the fundamental question is
"Why B?" is this shift really an indication of a shift from
result to purpose?
James H. Vellenga | firstname.lastname@example.org
Viewlogic Systems, Inc. __|__ 508-480-0881
293 Boston Post Road West | FAX: 508-480-0882
Marlboro, MA 01752-4615 |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:51 EDT