Re: Why isn't BAPTIZW translated?

From: DWILKINS@ucrac1.ucr.edu
Date: Thu Sep 19 1996 - 14:43:32 EDT


I think BAPTIZW does to a large extent retain its essential meaning, technical
term or not, but that includes the possibility of virtually any medium
being the medium of baptism. That in turn allows a metaphorical interpretation
so that we needn't assume a liquid is implied.

Don Wilkins
UC Riverside



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:52 EDT