Re: Galatians 5:4 THS XARITOS ECEPESATE: what kind of genitive?

From: David L. Moore (
Date: Sat Oct 12 1996 - 18:49:11 EDT

At 09:06 PM 10/12/96 +0100, Maurice A. O'Sullivan wrote:
>At 14:38 12/10/96 -0400, "David L. Moore" <>
> wrote:
>>Lightfoot also treats ECEPESATE as Carl does, but the only example he
>>gives is from a classical author, and I wonder if Koine would understand it
>>that way.
>Louw-Nida has this note on EKPIPTW:
>6 The meanings of parapi/ptw, e)kpi/ptw , a)postre/fomai , and a)fi/stamai
>appear to focus upon the initial aspects of dissociation. As such, they
>constitute a reversal of the process of joining or beginning to associate.
>To the question of whether this process of reversal is initiated actively or
>suffered passively there are alternative answers proposed by L-N in their
>comment on Ga 5:4
>"Note, however, that the underlying structure of the expression th=j
>xa/ritoj e)cepe/sate really involves `turning away from God who has shown
>grace.' For another interpretation of e)kpi/ptw in Ga 5.4, see 90.72. "
>"90.72 e)kpi/ptw : to no longer experience a state or condition - `to be
>outside of, to experience no longer.' th=j xa/ritoj e)cepe/sate `you no
>longer experienced (God's) grace' Ga 5.4."
>The latter seems in line with one of the main meanings of EKPIPTW in L.S.&J.
>"2. to fall from a thing, i.e be deprived of it "

        Thanks to Maurice O'S. for his input on this. I hadn't checked L&N
and am glad to have the additional lexical notes on ECEPESATE.

David L. Moore Director
Miami, Florida, USA Department of Education Southeastern Spanish District of the Assemblies of God

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:53 EDT