Re: 'default' aorist

Date: Tue Oct 29 1996 - 11:52:26 EST

Let me ask a hypothetical question about the default aorist then.
If a NT writer wanted to say that someting happened in the past, and it
was important that it happened once in the past, what would one expect?
 A Perfect? If NT authors use an aorist, does that mean we cannot say
that they "intend" (yes, I know all the problems about intention) to say
that the event took place completely in the past?

Ken Litwak
Graduate Theological Union
Berserkely, CA
(when not being a Java-enabled programmer)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:54 EDT