Re: 'default' aorist

From: Micheal Palmer (
Date: Sat Nov 09 1996 - 00:48:06 EST

Don Wilkins wrote in response to my note about the 'default aorist':
>I can't speak for other translators, but as an NASB translator I can say
>that we do not agree that the aorist indicative in itself does not indicate
>past action (sorry for the double negative). . . .

I did not intend to imply that the translators of the NASB would agree with
my comments on the aorist. I apologize to them for any wording in my note
which may have given that impression.

Micheal W. Palmer

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:56 EDT