From: FRED HALTOM (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Jan 21 1997 - 09:18:17 EST
"Wycliffe only did for England what Matthew and Mark did for the
Roman world. Christianity from its beginning spoke the tongue of the
peasant" (Glassman, Eugene. The Translation Debate: What Makes a
Bible Translation Good? Downer Grove: IVP, 1981.
The two basic approaches, formal correspondance or dynamic
equivalence leads to four types of translations: 1. highly literal 2.
modified literal (KJV, NKJV, NASB etc) 3. idiomatic (NEB, NIV, TEV,
NLT etc. 4. unduly free (LB and other paraphrases).
Acceptable types are 2 and 3 for me. If I'm reading historical
narrative, I like the idiomatic type. If I'm studying logical
discourse, I like modified literal type.
The important thing is to read the Bible. Whichever type translation works for
you, use it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:03 EDT