Re: Ei + future ind. vs. subjunctive

From: Paul J. Bodin (pjbodin@sirius.com)
Date: Sat Feb 15 1997 - 22:55:08 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 07:28 PM 2/15/97 -0600, Carl W. Conrad wrote:
 
> Since I'm not at the office I can't check the text readily, Ken, but I
> suspect that you have not transcribed it altogether accurately; I'm
> guessing that the above should read: HN DE POTE KAI LOGOUS POIOUNTA TINA
> DEHSHi EISAGEN--that the HN is the contracted EAN which is itself a
> contraction of EI AN and that EPOUNTA which certainly looks like a masc.
> acc. ptc. is probably POIOUNTA (because LOGOUS POIEIN is a common enough
> phrase). IF that's what the text is meant to be, THEN:

Actually it is:

HN DE POTE KAI LOGOUS EROUNTA TINA DEHSHi EISAGEIN, MALISTA MEN EOIKOTA TWi
PROSWPWi KAI TWi PRAGMATI OIKEIA LEGESQW, EPEITA hWS SAFESTATA KAI TAUTA.

                                   ------
 Paul J. Bodin <pjbodin@sirius.com> http://www.sirius.com/~pjbodin
              For PGP public key finger pjbodin@sirius.com
                    or check your favorite keyserver

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.5

iQB1AgUBMwaE+/goFkdd29RxAQH9tQMAkelasOm3+lpHP6PfVaDOV+R0RVRM2FHq
tNnzcTW6cR4spj3mkRpU1SkAMlSkDfv7Q9JRgTbdF9X25ewHwNjOKOniIe0JIRje
1eQeVLVTNiIBIeM93eziyfl9LGlRa/ec
=Jr1O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:05 EDT