From: S. M. Baugh (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Mar 12 1997 - 00:20:20 EST
Ronald Wong wrote:
>I certain agree that the construction is strange...yet, I believe that
>there is a historical purpose that Jesus and the way John recorded it to
>mean "I, I am." There is an OT pararallel. . . [some omitted] . . .
> think it would be possible to say that John and Jesus are
>(if I can be allowed to use the word :) ) Jesus' claim of being God, . . .
I caught that! Thought you could get away with it didn't you!
S. M. Baugh
Westminster Theological Seminary
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:09 EDT