From: Mike Luper (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Mar 27 1997 - 11:52:09 EST
Carl W. Conrad wrote:
> At 7:48 AM -0600 3/27/97, Mike Luper wrote:
> >Tim Baker wrote:
> >> I am working on a paper on the pistou christou formulation found in
> >Three recent commentaries have come out in support of reading Paul's
> >PISTOU CHRISTOU formulation as an objective genitive.
> I hate to throw a wet, pedantic blanket over this serious matter, but I do
> wish the subject-header could be amended to PISTIS CRISTOU, inasmuch as
> PISTOU CRISTOU is neither a subjective genitive nor an objective genitive
> but a plain old garden-variety genitive without a referent to point to.
> Carl W. Conrad
> Department of Classics, Washington University
> One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
> (314) 935-4018
> firstname.lastname@example.org OR email@example.com
> WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
Point well taken. It was quite early this morning when I responded and I
guess the old mind wasn't quite awake when I used PISTOU CHRISTOU from
the original post.
Michael Luper M.B. Biblical Seminary firstname.lastname@example.org Adj. Faculty, New Testament http://lennon.pub.csufresno.edu/~mdl18/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:10 EDT