Date: Sun May 04 1997 - 08:51:38 EDT
no. o an apxhc need not fall within the category historically meant by
anaphoric/relative, from the standpoint that it would have the same content
whether the personage meant had been previously mentioned in the document or
not. even if conceptually anaphoric, because of previous mention in a text, it
need not be seen as immediately anaphoric, which is probably what the
programmer has in mind.
bearded bill of asheville <firstname.lastname@example.org>
unca not having approved either whom or thereof.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:14 EDT