Date: Sun May 18 1997 - 16:31:26 EDT
thanks, jim. do i have to say i'd have had no problem with fagete edwdima =
phagete edodima as 'cognate object'. surely none on here who've paid any
attention to anything i've said would think me so narrow as to insist only
fagete faghta = phagete phageta would be cognate. i referred, however, to what
i'd just seen in the romans 8,3 landmine and thot the 3 second mention might
induce a modicum of reflection to help the issue.
bearded bill of asheville <firstname.lastname@example.org>
unca not having approved either whom or thereof.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:16 EDT