From: Carlton Winbery (email@example.com)
Date: Mon May 26 1997 - 03:53:21 EDT
Jim Beale wrote;
>Mounce tags ELATTOUSQAI as passive. The only other non-active
>infinitive in John is in 3 John 2, which is similar in syntax to
>this case, SE EUODOUSQAI. I think this is passive. Does the
>presence of the accusative help to decide whether the middle or
>passive is in view?
>>This verse always reminds me of the very idiomatic Thucydidean dictum, a
>>sort of expression of the second law of thermodynamics: PANTA FILEI
>>ELATTOUSQAI, "Everything tends to degenerate."
A more difficult use of the middle/passive form is in Heb 2:9. TON . . .
PAR' AGGELOUS HLATTWMENON . . . IHSOUN. "Jesus . . . who was made lower
than angels . . . This is deducted from Psalm 8 where the Psalmist uses
the active form with God as the subject. "You made him lower than angels."
Would not the perf. form be passive as a transformation of the Psalm
passage where God is the subject of the active? In the vs 9 God would be
the understood agent. The old Thayer lexicon as well as Zerwick/Grosvenor
both give these (Jn 3:30 included) as passives. LSJ give definitions only
for the active & Passive.
I would agree with Carl Conrad if we had only Jn 3:30. That seems much
more to me to be reflexive, but that is contra to all the resources that I
have at home at the moment. Heb. 2:9 (cf with 2:7) seems surely to be
passive as a transformation of the active possibly to avoid the use of the
name of YHWH.
Carlton L. Winbery
114 Beall St.
Pineville, LA 71360
Fax (318) 442-4996
Phone 318 487-7241 Home 448-6103
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:17 EDT