From: Carl W. Conrad (email@example.com)
Date: Mon May 26 1997 - 07:10:30 EDT
At 5:15 PM -0400 5/25/97, Jim Beale wrote:
>I was reading through John's Gospel, and I stopped to wonder at
> EKEINON DEI AUCANEIN, EME DE ELATTOUSQAI.
>Since EME is in the accusative, and ELATTOUSQAI is passive, I
>wondered why this verse is invariably translated as if the
>nominative and the active voice were present? Why not rather
>translate it as passive, "It is necessary for Him to increase,
>but for me to be decreased"?
The reason is that ELATTOUSQAI is middle (or reflexive), NOT passive--and
the English equivalents most commonly used to translate both of the Greek
verbs here in the infinitive are generally intransitive: "He must wax, but
I must wane."
This verse always reminds me of the very idiomatic Thucydidean dictum, a
sort of expression of the second law of thermodynamics: PANTA FILEI
ELATTOUSQAI, "Everything tends to degenerate."
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
firstname.lastname@example.org OR email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:17 EDT