From: Stevens, Charles C (Charles.Stevens@unisys.com)
Date: Wed Aug 06 1997 - 11:08:16 EDT
I can't speak to *studies* on the subject, but the original (not the
revised) New Testament to the New American Bible pointed out the use of
"word games" in John 3:3, explicitly contrasting "begotten from above"
in this verse with "born again" in v.4. The notes for this verse in
that translation read:
<<*begotten*: the Greek verb can mean "born" from a female principle,
or "begotten" by a male principle. As in 1:13 John primarily means it
as "begotten," though many early versions translate it as "born" or
even, with heightened baptismal symbolism, "reborn". *From above*: the
Greek term *anothen* means both "again" and "from above". V. 31 below
shows that Jesus means it as "from above", but Nicodemus misunderstands.
(A misunderstanding that brings out Jesus' treaching is a common
literary device in John.)??
Theological perspectives aside, is this reasonable, both in this
specific instance and, as the notes assert, elsewhere in the Gospel of
-Chuck Stevens [SMTP: Charles.Stevens@unisys.com]
>From: Steven Cox[SMTP:email@example.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 1997 7:20 AM
>Subject: Re: Lamsa and Aramaic (puns again)
> Hello b-greekers
> the last time this came up I asked if anyone had seen a
> reliable study on the comparative incidence of wordgames
> (ie puns like John 15:2) in the recorded words of Christ
> as recorded in Greek vs a hypothetical Aramaic.
> I've only browsed one of Lamsa's books once but didn't see
> anything that seemed more than the natural "incidence of
> coincidence" ... have I missed the good stuff?
> surely someone has done comparative research on this?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:24 EDT