From: lakr (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Sep 25 1997 - 19:49:30 EDT
> I'm confused by what seems to be a lack of agreement in Rev 8:9:
> Rev 8:9 KAI APEQANEN TO TRITON TWN KTISMATWN TWN EN THi QALASSHi, *TA*
> *ECONTA* PSUCAS, KAI TO TRITON TWN PLOIWN DEFQARHSAN.
> Rev 8:9 And a third of the creatures in the sea that had life died, and a
> third of the ships were destroyed.
> TA ECONTA is nominative...but shouldn't it be genitive? I was thinking that
> it refers back to TWN TKISMATWN. Does it refer to something else?
Could it not refer back to TO TRITON ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:30 EDT