From: Andrew Kulikovsky (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Sep 24 1997 - 12:46:45 EDT
I get the impression, from a number of posts on this list (and other
lists as well) that being an inerrantist is being unscholarly - it's as
though the attitude is well, "you're an inerrantist - that speaks for
itself - you can't be a thinking scholar and an inerrantist". In other
words "only a complete moron would be an inerrantist."
Is this what people think - That's the impression I get anyway.
Of course, there have been and still are many brilliant inerrantist
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:30 EDT