From: Andrew Kulikovsky (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Sep 25 1997 - 05:41:28 EDT
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> At 04:46 PM 9/24/97 +0000, Andrew Kulikovsky wrote:
> >I get the impression, from a number of posts on this list (and other
> >lists as well) that being an inerrantist is being unscholarly - it's as
> >though the attitude is well, "you're an inerrantist - that speaks for
> >itself - you can't be a thinking scholar and an inerrantist". In other
> >words "only a complete moron would be an inerrantist."
> If this is in response to the 1 John 2:7-8 thread, I really don't get it. I
> never claimed that 1 John contained any errors.
No Jonathan, relax, it had nothing to do with you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:30 EDT