From: Ben Crick (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Oct 12 1997 - 02:13:29 EDT
On Sat 11 Oct 97 (16:22:19), email@example.com wrote:
> chicken liver at least has the benefit of being more in touch with the
> "fleshly" material side of logos and does not connote a non-corporeal,
> non substantial (in the philosophical sense of the term) idea such as
> (though I must, it seems, go on the record as also opposing "chicken
> liver" as a poor selection) :>)
ROTFL! I never thought I'd see hepatoscopy promoted on a Christian forum! EGW KURIOS ETAZWN KARDIAS, KAI DOKIMAZWN NEFROUS, ktl (Jeremiah 17:10 LXX). "The king of Babylon... consulted with images, he looked in the liver"
(Ezekiel 21:21 KJV; the LXX has paraphrased KATASKOPHSASQAI).
And we're having a chicken dinner at home today...
-- Revd Ben Crick, BA CF <firstname.lastname@example.org> 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK) http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:32 EDT