From: Thomas Biddy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Oct 19 1997 - 05:41:19 EDT
On Sat, 18 Oct 1997, Paul S. Dixon wrote:
> If we take YUCAS as "souls" (so most [all?]
> translations), then how is it that these souls, which are certainly
> already alive, come to life? Is this why somebody here said Carl C takes
> it as "corpses"? Now, I can see corpses coming alive, but not souls that
> were already alive. But, is "corpses" really the meaning here? I would
> like a little light on this one.
Me, too. I understand what corpses are but the meaning of 'soul' seems
vague and varied.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:34 EDT