From: Jonathan Robie (jonathan@texcel.no)
Date: Sun Dec 07 1997 - 08:13:08 EST
At 07:06 AM 12/7/97 -0600, Carl William Conrad wrote:
>I don't really think it's a chiasm; if it were, then B' should refer to
>the pigs and A' to the dogs again.
That's precisely the claim they are making, and that's precisely the claim
that I don't understand. They say that A' *does* refer to the dogs again.
>It should probably be realized that this saying may originally have been
>using "dogs" to mean "Gentiles"--just as in the story of the
>Syro-Phoenician Woman (children's food to dogs, even the dogs under the
>table get the crumbs--all in the Marcan context of lots of crumbs left
>over after the miraculous feedings of multitudes).
What would the swine symbolize if the dogs are Gentiles?
Jonathan
jonathan@texcel.no
Texcel Research
http://www.texcel.no
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:36 EDT