From: Phil Hildenbrandt (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 10 1998 - 21:39:19 EST
At 11:07 AM 3/11/98 +1100, George Athas wrote:
>The earliest and best manuscripts (such as Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus) don't
>actually have Barabbas' given name (IHSOUN) either in v17 or in v16. However,
>some do. The difficulty is ascertaining whether it was there originally.
>& Co assign a "C" value to the addition of IHSOUN to Barabbas, meaning that
>based on the evidence, they couldn't decide one way or the other as to
>it was originally there.
Thanks George. Admittedly, this answer seems to be the majority opinion but
it just doesn't seem to alleviate my concern.
/ .\_ Phil "Paul Morphy" Hildenbrandt, Pyramid TD
| ( ___) http://www.earthcorp.com/pyramid
| \ -or-
| = | http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/Loge/5446
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:09 EDT