From: Steven Cox (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Mar 16 1998 - 08:28:12 EST
At 21:42 98/03/15 -0700, you wrote:
>This has implications for the comma in Luke 23:43, does it not?
I deliberately didn't cite that because I'd guess SHMERON
there is quite legitimately required by the way the thief
specified his request to be remembered with hOTAN ELQHiS.
But Paul's uses in Acts 20:26 and Acts 26:2 seem redundant.
(or are they? - as George's post on Hebrew Ha'Yom rules out
a hebraism in Ge25:33 ktl., what is Paul trying to add?)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:10 EDT