From: Juan Stam (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Mar 24 1998 - 07:15:35 EST
Greetings from Costa Rica!
I have a question about Aune's interpretation of Rev 3.2. Although he showed
that the neut plural TA LOIPA could refer to persons, to me he did not seem
to demonstrate that it ought to. I wonder if a more natural interpretation
of the neut pl might still be "those things which remain" (elements of
faith, congregational life, etc, even though tepid). Can it be shown that
"those who" is the meaning of TA LOIPA?
Juan Stam, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:16 EDT