From: Eric Weiss (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jun 23 1998 - 13:28:07 EDT
Jonathan Robie wrote:
> At 10:11 AM 6/23/98 -0700, Eric Weiss wrote:
> >Stephen Long wrote:
> >> Also, is there a rule of translating similar to Occam's Razor,
> >>that the simplest explanation is the most likely?
Re: the Occam's Razor thing. While teaching a class on Romans, when I came to the vexing
question in Romans 7:7-25 about who is Paul talking about, whether it's his pre-Christian
life, his current struggles, etc., I suggested that rather than impose our theological
predispositions and presuppositions that we apply Occam's Razor and see what we get - i.e.,
assume Paul uses the past tense (aorist) when he is speaking about his past and the present
tense when he is speaking about his present situation. I liked the resulting interpretation
and I think J.I. Packer in KEEP IN STEP WITH THE SPIRIT concludes the same.
-- "Eric S. Weiss" email@example.com http://home1.gte.net/eweiss/index.htm S.D.G.
--- b-greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek To post a message to the list, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org To subscribe, mailto:email@example.com To unsubscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=[email@example.com]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:49 EDT