From: Jonathan Robie (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Sep 30 1998 - 22:50:04 EDT
>Ed Gorham wrote:
>>Porter's "Idioms" is a good book for showing how the tenses are not
>>necessarily temporal...he catalogs many instances, for example, where the
>>aorist is used in a present sense. But I wish he'd explain a little more
>>on the positive side of the argument for aspect, rather than simply de-bunk
>>the older paradigms.
I think you hit the nail on the head. After reading Porter's thesis, and
then his Idioms, I felt he did little to show how tense and aspect are
conveyed by Greek grammar; instead, he tried to debunk traditional
frameworks without providing a new one.
At 10:53 AM 9/30/98 -0700, Dale M. Wheeler wrote:
>Let me suggest that the model presented by Fanning (Verbal Aspect) and BDF
>is very sound for understanding the Imp'v in the NT; following is the
>section from my syntax notes contained in Bible Companion/GRAMCORD for
>Windows on the Imp'v. Hope this helps.
I really like these notes. The Bible Companion/GRAMCORD notes are very
clear, practical, and helpful. I have used them quite a bit.
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:02 EDT