Re: PRWTH in Luke 2:2

From: Timo Flink (Timo.Flink@mime.mikkeliamk.fi)
Date: Wed Sep 30 1998 - 02:35:58 EDT


Carl wrote:

>know, equivalent formulations; the impossible formulation is hH hAUTH
>APOGRAFH.

I beg pardon for my ignorance, but why is hH hAUTH APOGRAFH
impossible? In Roman 11:30 we have THi TOUTWN APEIQEIA and in 2.
Peter 1:15 we have THN TOUTWN MNHMHN.

Am I missing something in my grammar here???

Timo Flink

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:03 EDT