Re: Pauline Authorship of Hebrews

From: Mark Goodacre (
Date: Fri Oct 02 1998 - 08:44:01 EDT wrote:

> ...there appears to be no basis at all in the NT
> Greek text for the proposition being argued here--and although it is
> proposed that "the almost universal testimony of the MS evidence is
> that Hebrews is Pauline," I do wonder exactly what MS evidence is being
> referred to here...

P46 is probably worth mentioning. It is a papyrus codex of 86 leaves dating
from c. 200 and featuring epistles in this order: Romans, Hebrews, 1 Cor., 2
Cor., Eph., Gal., Phil., Col and 1 Thess. I think that this is as early as the
the paypyrus evidence will take us.

Dr Mark Goodacre
  Dept of Theology Tel: +44 (0)121 414 7512
  University of Birmingham Fax: +44 (0)121 414 6866
  Birmingham B15 2TT
  United Kingdom

World Without Q:

B-Greek home page:
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: []
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
To subscribe, send a message to

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:03 EDT