From: clayton stirling bartholomew (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Oct 29 1998 - 02:51:59 EST
Jerry Dean wrote:
> In Luke 10:25 a question is asked by the lawyer in aorist participle when
> asking what to do. Jesus then responds with present participle. Being
> aware that an aorist participle may or may not mean one event, is it
> possible that the lawyer is asking what "one" event can get one eternal
> life, with Jesus responding that it is not "one" act but a "life style"?
> Does Luke contrasts these two participles in this passage to stress
> continual action against one, or is it just a style for Luke?
I read over the passage and I see nothing at all in the use of participles in
this passage which would lend itself to your proposed interpretation.
TI POIHSAS ZWHN AIWNION KLHRONOMHSW;
I think that TI POIHSAS may indicate either a single thing or a series of
things. The form of the question is vague. TI is a singular neuter accusative,
and if I understand the semantics of TI, it can refer to a series of things, a
collection of things or a single thing. In short the grammar of the passage
does not contain the information you are looking for.
Also, I don't see any participle in Jesus' answer:
TOUTO POIEI KAI ZHSHi
I didn't check any commentaries on this one. Just winging it based on 4-5
years of reading Lukan syntax every day.
Perhaps one of the experts will help you with this.
-- Clayton Stirling Bartholomew Three Tree Point P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:05 EDT