From: clayton stirling bartholomew (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Nov 12 1998 - 12:49:05 EST
> My facsimile of Bezae clearly has QS (abbreviation for QEOS),
> but that doesn't mean that the original might not show erasure marks. The
> reason for mentioning this possibility is that although the N in the
> abbreviation is identical to the other instances of N in the ms., the Q is
> slightly different from most of the other thetas in the immediate context.
> Also, a slight line is just before the Q, which could be bleed over from the
> latin on the other side or perhaps has been noted as an earlier reading in the
> ms. In summary, based on my own reading of D, I would go with QS, but a look
> at the original ms. might change my opinion due to the possibility of an
> erasure. But that erasure is not certain at all in the facsimile.
Thank you Bill.
>Although this question probably belongs more on the TC list, I'll give a brief
My understanding from discussions with Edward is that TC questions are
permitted on B-greek.
One further question about your response. I assume that your facsimile reads
QN not QS for the nomina sacra. There seems to be a slight ambiguity about
this in your post as quoted above.
The Latin side reads the nomina sacra DM.
-- Clayton Stirling Bartholomew Three Tree Point P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:07 EDT