Re: transgressions

From: Bart Ehrman (
Date: Tue Feb 16 1999 - 20:14:39 EST

   OK, consider me emboldened by Carl Conrad's reply.

   Does anyone want to explain to me how s/he understands the grammar of 2
Clement 2:6: ti oun estin poiesantas epituchein auton, ei me to hosios
kai dikaios anastrephesthai?

-- Bart Ehrman


On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Carl W. Conrad wrote:

> At 7:11 PM -0500 2/16/99, Bart Ehrman wrote:
> > I haven't followed the ins and outs of the list very carefully, and
> >don't want to pose questions that are deemed inappropriate. So, is there
> >a general sense as to whether syntactical questions pertaining to the
> >Apostolic Fathers would transgress the stated purpose of the list?
> Sure. From the FAQ: "B-GREEK is an electronic conference designed to foster
> communication concerning the scholarly study of the Greek Bible and related
> Jewish and Christian Greek texts, matters of concern to beginning and
> advanced students of Biblical Greek such as textbooks, reference works,
> bibliography and research tools, with a fundamental focus on understanding
> the Greek text of the Bible."
> I think that the Apostolic Fathers falls under that heading of "related
> Jewish and Christian Greek texts" ...
> Carl W. Conrad
> Department of Classics/Washington University
> One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
> Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
> OR
> WWW:

B-Greek home page:
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: []
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
To subscribe, send a message to

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:16 EDT