From: Bill Ross (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Apr 16 1999 - 16:58:46 EDT
In my own experience it is not only unusual and unexpected but utterly
unthinkable that an intransitive verb like EIMI should have a direct object
or that a direct object should have the sense of "in."
Would this be an example of EIMI taking a direct object?
KAQWS AXION ESTIN - 2 Thess 1:3
Is EIMI acting transitively in Eph 2:8:
I have not heard back from you about examples of the evolving form of ESTE
SESWiMENOI elsewhere in the NT? Should I expect to find any?
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:24 EDT