From: Mary Pendergraft (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri May 28 1999 - 20:03:45 EDT
> I'm going to try to keep this short and simple.
> First, after using two imperatives in the same tense, a variation of tense in
> a third parallel command draws attention to the change.
> Second, when the aorist is used together in parallel with the present, the
> present is more emphatic because of the relative aspect of the tenses (aorist
> is undifferentiated action while the present is imperfective) and because the
> aorist is the default tense (more common).
> So, my reasons are related to aspect, but are more closely tied in with how
> verbal opposition creates emphasis or prominence. And I assume that phrases,
> words, etc, that are relatively more prominent than their context generally
> reflect "the point".
Alternatively, we can consider that this is a passage where the "rules"
of grammar work: PARALABE is aorist imperative because Joseph needs to
grab up his family only once, whereas fleeing (FEUGE) and making his way
(POREUOU) all the way to Egypt will be a process involving some time.
Associate Professor of Classical Languages
Wake Forest University
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:28 EDT