From: Jim West (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Aug 04 1999 - 17:04:13 EDT
At 04:43 PM 8/4/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Please disregard my two previous posts that were incomplete and that
>escaped without my permission.
>1. hAITINES MWRAI LABOUSAI E W Delta Pi Omega fam13 565
>2. AI GAR MWRAI LABOUSAI Aleph B C L Sigma 33
>As I was working on a variant in Matt 25:3, I wondered how the first
>variant could make sense with the relative AITINES (carried over from Matt
>25:1b). Could AITINES be a whole relative clause on its own here?
It seems that that is one possibility. NA27 doesnt even list the variant-
so the editors must not have taken it very seriously. It seems to me a
clarifying clause attached to what follows- but it is apparently unnecessary
and doesnt really add abything to the verse sense wise.
Jim West, ThD
web page- http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:34 EDT