From: Edgar Foster (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Aug 15 1999 - 18:54:23 EDT
In a commentary I've recently been consulting by James M. Scott, the
"The meaning of _we have_ has been the subject of considerable debate.
It has gone unnoticed, however, that in conditional sentences having
EAN (if) + the aorist subjunctive in the protasis and the present
indicative of ECHW (have) in the apodosis, the latter expresses a
possession that an individual already has had (or not had) all along
(cf. 1 John 2:1; Matt. 5:46; John 6:53), not just reception immediately
consequent upon the action of the protasis" (2 Corinthians: New
International Biblical Commentary. James Scott. 127).
I wonder what members of this list think about this observation. I have
generally taken EAN and ECOMEN in 2 Cor. 5:2 as "If . . . then we are
to have." Conversely, Scott says that we (believers) already have the
"house from God." Its a fascinating argument and one that I am
extremely curious about.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:35 EDT