Re: Private question on "Present-future" Tense (was"Ungrammatical ...")

Date: Fri Sep 03 1999 - 08:58:07 EDT

In a message dated 9/3/99 12:46:30 PM !!!First Boot!!!, writes:

> Actually this was cited by Michael Haggett in his original discussion; the
> verse is wrong--those words are found in Matthew 26:18 rather than 26:19,
> and there's no question but that POIW here, though present tense, is used
> in the sense of a future tense.

Thanks. I understood that Michael Haggett had made the original citation,
however, I just felt more comfortable showing my ignorance with you as I have
done before and you have always been very gracious.

> Let me add that I've found your input on the B-Translation list
> interesting.

You can say it, strange. :-)

Sola Gratia,
Always Under Grace!

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:38 EDT