From: Joe A. Friberg (JoeFriberg@email.msn.com)
Date: Fri Oct 08 1999 - 17:57:25 EDT
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Mullins <mullik@CHAMPINT.COM>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 10:49 AM
> I don't understand why EKLIPHi is singular here. Is it used as an
> Lk 16:9 KAI EGW hUMIN LEGW, hEAUTOIS POIHSATE FILOUS EK TOU MAMWNA THS
> hINA hOTAN EKLIPHi DEXWNTAI hUMAS EIS TAS AIWNIOUS SKHNAS.
The 3sg. subject of EKLIPHi is coreferrential with TOU MAMWNA which is m.sg.
That is, it is the "mammon" (sg.) that will fail you (pl.). Mammon has a
generic reference, as to a general principle.
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:41 EDT