From: Carl W. Conrad (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Oct 13 1999 - 06:09:28 EDT
At 8:44 PM -0400 10/12/99, Jim West wrote:
>At 01:31 AM 10/13/99 +0100, Michael wrote:
>>Does ANYBODY out there think that the smooth breathing serves a useful
>function, and would any of you regret its lost if it were omitted from
>printed and published texts?
>The oldest manuscripts of the NT did not have them; so their loss would be
>no great loss at all.
There are other things too that the oldest MSS also didn't have, such as
punctuation and word-division; I think I might get used to looking at texts
as they appear in the oldest MSS, but I'm grateful for being able to look
at the texts as they are printed today.
I think there are lots of improvements that could have been made with the
alphabet, but that sort of reform is the hardest to effectuate, unless one
has a tradition and authority such as those that govern German and French
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:42 EDT