Re: GAR and Paratactic Connectors

From: Carl W. Conrad (
Date: Thu Oct 14 1999 - 05:49:05 EDT

At 8:30 PM -0700 10/13/99, clayton stirling bartholomew wrote:
>George Goolde wrote:
>>. . .
>> But as Carl also pointed out in another post, GAR always has the
>> force of explaining what preceded.
>Always is a very inclusive word. Does GAR really always have this force?

I'm from Missouri, Clay; can you show me where it DOESN'T have an implicit,
"That's because ..." sense?

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649

B-Greek home page:
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: []
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
To subscribe, send a message to

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:43 EDT