From: yochanan bitan (ButhFam@compuserve.com)
Date: Sun Oct 17 1999 - 04:08:40 EDT
>1. I have always assumed that the primary difference between omicron &
>was quantitative/length rather than quality. Was this true at some point,
>and when did it cease being true?
by mid-second century BCE vowel length had been neutralized, [the process
was probably enhanced by the spread of greek throughout the mediteranean
and near east after Alex.] we may assume from the mistakes in the papyri
that o-mega vs o-mikron were pronounced the same. both theos and logos can
be pronounced with a single 'o' sound.
>2. Would you begin to recommend a bibliography on the subject, covering
>different proposed systems, reconstructions, etc.?
you might want to look at
g. horrocks "Greek, a history of the language and its speakers"
though for further details it will refer you to
w. allen (vox graeca,3rd ed., cambridge) for the old 4-5 cent BCE stuff
f. gignac (grammar of greek papyri..., v. 1: phonology, 1976, milan)
also, 2 papers will be read at SBL, Greek section, in Boston this year that
will deal with this.
is this important?
i would argue, yes,
a. an aural foundation is necessary for the best language learning
b. some aural system must be chosen.
c. a "practical first century" would allow reading of nt and papyri
without undue stress. [ ei=i, h, ai=e, a, w=o, ou, oi=u (french 'u') ] it
is also 3/4 of the way to medival greek and the modern system.
come to boston.
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:43 EDT